If the top seeded teams ALWAYS won their games you’d have saved a ton of time by clicking the “pick higher seeds to win” button and been done with it. As yesterday demonstrated this isn’t always a winning strategy. Without bemoaning the fact that Northwestern ALMOST won (almost happens all the time), the following significant upsets DID occur:
A) #8 Wisconsin defeated #1 and defending champ Villanova
B) #11 Xavier sent #3 FSU packing
C) #4 Purdue defeated #5 Iowa State (not technically an upset, but tell that to Purdue fans)
Looking at our distribution report, there were 7 entries that picked ‘Nova to bow out in the 2nd round, though 31 having them making it to the championship, 20 winning it all. You can guess who’s happier now!
Given the upsets the sorted by possible report is probably a better indicator than the standard status report- in the current point ranking 2 entries in the top 15 leaders have Villanova winning it all. That being said the leader, “Big 10 Love” DOES have a clean slate in the Great 8 (including Wisconsin). “Boiler Pete” was the beneficiary of two of the aforementioned upsets, but is going strongly against archetype picking Purdue to win it all (one of three such entries).
All 4 of the top entries in the status report sorted by possible points currently have clean G8s, 2 wistfully thinking of a Purdue victory, one Duke, and one UNC. Which is to say to the remaining 117 entries that there are many games left to play before you can give up on your entry.
Even current cellar dwellers “Starbucks Fan” and “rather be knitting” have respectable possible scores of 141 and 145 respectively. If you go to the hoopness site you can perform “Dynamic Status” reports to see what would happen if, for example, UCLA wins it all. Enjoy…